A Danger to Children
Homosexuals
Disproportionately Molest Children.
Overview
"[According to Freud] perversion in adulthood denotes the continuation into adult life of infantile sexual behaviour and inclinations, and represents a possible outcome of a failure of social conditioning to suppress perverse sexuality."[68:57]
Data about the disproportionate molestation of children by homosexuals confirms the common-sense layman's view that perverts of all stripes are more likely than others to molest children. There are three primary reasons why homosexuals molest children: They were homosexually molested themselves, they lack self-control over their urges, or they remain at a childish stage of emotional development. We will examine these in turn as an overview to this entire section:
1) They were homosexually molested themselves: Some studies have shown that over 87% of homosexuals were homosexually-molested at a young age, which implies (assuming that 66% act out that molestation) that 60% of homosexuals are potential child-molesters.
"The first sexual experience of the vast majority of homosexual men... was with a much OLDER homosexual. Even liberal Denmark has steadfastly refused homosexual adoption rights for this reason."[g8]
"Calder[71]... notes that men in prison for sex offences often complain bitterly of [homosexual molestation] in youth and say that is what perverted them."[W122]
"Ollendorff[72] has suggested that if the first orgasms shared with another person are obtained homosexually, this may condition the adolescent towards deviant sexuality for the rest of his life."[W121]
"Frisbie (1969)[87] reports that 24% of her sample of offenders claimed that during their own childhood they had experienced sexual encounters with adults. This is considerably higher than in groups of normal males (Finkelhor, 1979)[88]. The data presented by Frisbie seem to indicate that offenders who were themselves molested as children were more likely to be homosexual or ambisexual offenders as adults. As such offenders were themselves molested by males, it could be suggested that the experience of victimisation as a child provides a modelling experience for homosexual paedophilia; that the child molested by a male may subsequently identify himself with the adult in such interactions."[68]
"These investigators contend that, first, the cause of homosexuality is the individuals LEARNING this sex role from others (Gagnon and Simon, 1969, 1973; Henderson, 1975)[80,81,82], or that the individual's need to acquire the support and good will of [people they respect] who are sexual deviants results in their becoming sexually-deviant (role-acquisition)."[K332]-Levine
The "dangers of homosexual corruption of youths by older males is almost an article of faith among some judges and politicians."[W121]
Freud based his knowledge of sexual stages on observing the resulting sexual behaviour of people who had been "seduced" at particular times in their life. People were molested at an early age by a member of the same sex developed homosexually. This is where the term "seduction" comes from, and this is why the gay organisation NAMBLA insists on "sex before [age] eight, or else it's too late." They mean: too late to definitely affect the child's sexual development.
2) They lack self-control: Homosexuals have a need for frequent sexual encounters, partly rooted in the transitory and unsatisfying nature of the homosexual "lifestyle" and partly caused by childish impulsiveness. This is why we find the use of everyday facilities, washrooms and parks, doubling as meeting places for homosexuals who want a quick sexual encounter on their way to or from work. Homosexuals try to find sexual contacts near work or home, where they can indulge themselves as often as the need strikes. If an opportunity to molest is presented to the homosexual, where he can indulge himself at will with little ramification, he takes immediate advantage of it.
"[One] important feature of gay life is the gay baths.... The baths... exist.... to provide an inexpensive place where homosexual men can engage in FREQUENT, anonymous sexual activity..."[B239] (emphasis mine)
"On Friday and Saturday nights the baths were packed, especially just after the bars closed for the night. At other times men would stop by the baths on their way to work or during their lunch hour or while waiting to return home by train or bus. At one bath a group of workingmen would congregate early in the morning once or twice a week for sex, followed by breakfast. One informant regularly slept at the baths two nights a week rather than commuting twenty miles every day."[B241]
"[I have] a healthy commitment to depravity." Gerald Hannon, Toronto Gay Activist, Globe and Mail, April 4, 1992. The SAME person who supported the institutionalised molestation of children.
A 1985 study in Psychological Reports stated that homosexuals were up to 100 times more likely than heterosexuals to involve themselves sexually with child pupils.[16] "A homosexual New York Teachers Union went on strike for the 'right' to have sexual relationships with their students."[g8] (The board approved, provided that these acts did not occur on school property.)
"One feature of homosexual society ... is the predilection of some homosexuals for orgiastic parties at which numbers of couples, or groups of three or four or even more, may have sex together in the same room, changing roles and swapping partners as the mood takes them.... Perhaps it is an indication that in some homosexual persons the emotional concomitants of sexuality have never matured further than the stage of adolescent dormitory games."[W112]
3) Infantilism: The homosexual, like all other perverts, is stuck in an infantile stage of emotional development, which means that he will... (a) "identify" with children, (b) require instant gratification of urges, (c) be capable of "tantrums" and "bullying" to get what he wants, and (d) lack the self-control to prevent himself from taking advantage of any opportunity which arises. Unlike a child, however, the homosexual possesses an adult knowledge of sodomy and fellatio, and will necessarily require the child to perform these acts, under physical and emotional intimidation.
The narcissistic object-choice, choosing one's own sex over another, compounded with a childish mentality, predisposes homosexuals to paedophilia: "In loving a boy, a man may be admiring the boy he would like to have been or actually was" (Storr, 1964)[93] The paedophile "identifies" with the child, identification being a distinguishing feature of homosexual relationships in general. "(Bell and Hall, 1976, p. 195)[89] draw attention to a number of factors presumed to have played a role in the development of their client's paedophilic interest, including castration fears, lack of aggression, maternal dependence, gender identity confusion and a poor relationship with his father, but the dominant conclusion seems to be that the sexual interest in children was an expression of the client's personal child-like level of functioning: 'these activities can best be understood as the expression of an inadequate, infantile personality...'"[85]. Most of these factors are typical of homosexual life-history and character, as will be later demonstrated.
"In the context of [a pathological inability to have normal sexual relationships] children become more attractive than adults in that they are less of a threat, less dominant, more affectionate and more easily dominated."[85] In other words, those who are too cowardly to engage in normal relationships (all perverts) find children to be less of a threat.
"An essential element in most perverse fantasies is that they involve a wish to harm, a symbolic 'act of revenge' (Stoller, 1975, p.6)[90]. Perversions such as paedophilia, though Stoller does not deal specifically with this form of perversion, always involve 'hostility, revenge, triumph and a dehumanised sex object' and 'there is always a victim'"[85]. Both Stiller and Rosen (1979)[91] point out that perverse sexual fantasy is a way of dealing with humiliation or loss of esteem. In homosexuals, molestation can, in addition, be a way of enacting revenge against society: "The important component for the paedophile, [Lambert, 1975][92] suggested, is a form of revenge against the fantasised parents of the child."
The homosexual movement, as anyone can see, bears a tremendous animus against normal society, as is exemplified in the article "The Gay Revolutionary. "Anyone who denies this really does not know this movement very well. Paedophilia is a way to enact revenge against the normal society that has excluded them, and which they blame for their inability to feel comfortable with what they are doing.
Homosexual Recruitment
"It is beside the point, and more than a little disingenuous, to contend that most sexual abuse of young people happens in the non-gay world. Given that 90-99 per cent of the population is not homosexual, most of everything happens in the non-gay world. Whether or not the relative incidence of such abuse is higher among homosexuals (and it is highly counter-intuitive to suggest that it is not), many gays are entirely straightforward about their goal of recruiting boys to the homosexual subculture.... There is no secret about the role that boys play in the actual and fantasy world of homosexuality."[6]
One can find examples of attempted recruitment on the Canadian high-school chat groups, where anonymous messages are posted that start with "Gay? Lesbian? Think you might be?" and end with a phone-number and address to contact a "counselling" service. Homosexuals do recruit. And, what's more, "[They say] to the sexually-uncertain boy: If you think you are, you are. [And they] call on parents to be 'accepting' of that 'discovery' and show that they approve it."[6]
"[G]ay sexual abuse is different [from other forms] in that it is the seduction of the youth into a long-term, perhaps life-long, 'alternative lifestyle'.... Moreover, [molestation is,] according to [their] way of thinking, simply a matter of helping boys to accept and enjoy what they already are, namely, gay."[6]
The NAMBLA Connection
"There is... the North American Man-Boy Love Association, a contingent of gay activists who identify themselves, unashamedly, as paedophiles. They insist that nothing in their 'sexual orientation' should disqualify them to work as professional counsellors, say, in the schools of New York, and to counsel young boys."[7]
"on the evenings of March 2, 3, and 5, viewers of WNBC-TV News in New York saw [the] harrowing investigative report on NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association), a group whose goal, anchorman Chuck Scarborough explained, is 'to legally seduce your children.' Reported by John Miller, the powerful series showed footage of NAMBLA recruitment sessions, mailings, and other literature, including photographs of undressed boys. Most disturbing was the allegation --backed up by tapes of recruitment sessions-- that two senior officials in the organisation are veterans of the New York public school system. One of these men was employed for seven years as the school psychologist at PS 75 in Queens; the other is a long-time faculty member of the elite Bronx High School of Science. The Board of Education, the Inspector General's office, and the school principal have all known about his NAMBLA affiliation since 1985, but parents and students have never been informed.
In a particularly distressing segment, WNBC played the tape of a secret meeting of NAMBLA members in the atrium of the Citicorp building. On the tape, the Bronx High School teacher is heard advising a new, younger, member, identified by WNBC as a librarian at George Washington High School, to keep his membership secret until he 'has tenure.'"[5]
A Good Question: If heterosexuals are such molesters as gays claim, we might wonder why there is no equivalent advocacy-group, in terms of membership and influence, for the legalisation of Man-Girl relations. The reason is that homosexuals are voracious and organised molesters of male children --homosexuals are the authors of Institutionalised Molestation.
This organisation results from the fact that homosexual males in these settings are not just molesting children; they are also sex-partners to each other. There is a closeness between them that would not be found in the corresponding heterosexual situation. In addition to this, there is a psychoanalytic reason for high-organisation: high homosexual organisation results from increased neurotic tendencies, which are a common feature of the homosexual psyche. Let's face it, if homosexuals can band together in such a spectacular fashion to march on Washington, then they can band together to molest children, or to donate infected blood.
Either way, the removal of the stigmatisation of homosexuality has resulted in the unleashing of a veritable Pandora's box of corruption upon our young. Even now, homosexuals are trying to legalise and institutionalise adult-child relations in our society. "[H]omosexual instincts soon make themselves apparent whenever they are given a free rein."[W25]
Children "must have the unhindered right to have sex with members of any age of the same or opposite sex..."[57] From the NAMBLA document, "Resolution on the Liberation of Children and Youth." That's right, they are "liberating" children from the oppressive heterosexuality of their parents.
The U.S. "National Gay
Rights Platform" (spelled out in 1972 and supported by Canadian Homosexuals)[G356]
called for, and still calls for:
The anti-sodomy law, restricting anal-sex to 18 year old youths, was just struck down in Ontario as "unconstitutional" (May 1995) thanks to homosexual activists who want to legitimise adult-child anal-sex and increase their numbers. Police will NO LONGER be able to charge adults who homosexually molest children. This will also permit the spreading of AIDS to the next generation to increase cases, to justify more AIDS-research funding, while simultaneously facilitating revenge against normal society.
Gairdner's Findings
"Although homosexuals represent only between 1 and 4 percent of the entire population (up to 2 percent exclusively homosexual; and 2 percent casual bisexuals), studies based on ample U.S. data tell us that they perpetrate between one-third and one-half of all child molestation's (Los Angeles Times survey, August 26, 1985), and that homosexual teachers commit between 25 and 80 percent of all pupil molestations. They are 12 times more likely to molest children than are normal people, and seven times more likely to molest pupils. About 31 percent of those claiming molestation by men were homosexually assaulted. Fully 35 percent of British boys (and 9 percent of girls) say that they have been actively approached by adult homosexuals (2 percent and 1 percent, respectively, say they 'succumbed')."[G388]
"[M]ost of us, given the opportunity and the assurance of safety, would no doubt choose to share our sexuality with someone under the age of consent."[58]
"A British Columbia study of 2099 child sexual abuse cases, although never mentioning the word homosexual, found that 50 percent of the victims were boys, a majority were under 12, and 94 percent of the perpetrators were male.[14]
A national study by the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, covering the decade 1980-89, found that 91 percent of perpetrators of sexual assault on children were male, and 46.5 percent of victims of sexual assault and 'other sexual violations' were boys.[15] Both studies tell us that homosexuals (at 4 percent of the population) are proportionately vastly more likely than heterosexuals to abuse children.
A 1985 study in Psychological Reports stated that homosexuals were up to 100 times more likely than heterosexuals to involve themselves sexually with child pupils.[16] Homosexual New York teachers recently agreed such acts were improper on school property --but reserved the right to 'have relations' with children after school.[17]
In its 1987 study, 'Murder, Violence, and Homosexuality,' the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality (ISIS) reported that of all multiple or serial murders in the United States in the two decades after 1970, homosexuals killed at least 68 percent of the victims, were implicated in 41 percent of the total sets of crimes, and committed 70 percent of the worst 10 sets. Other studies arrive independently at the same, roughly two-thirds, figure.
C. Allen's 'A Textbook of Psychosexual Disorders' (1969), and J.P. de River's 'The Sexual Criminal' (1956), say much the same. Convicted homosexual murderer Jeffrey Dahmer, who raped, killed, then raped them dead, and ate parts of 15 boys and young men, will swell this number greatly (Toronto Star, February 16, 1992)."[G388]
Homosexuality and Schizophrenia
Homosexuality is characterised by infantile emotional development. Many who have not developed properly have failed to make the object-subject distinction known as individuation, where the subject learns to distinguish between himself and his environment. This is a common feature of serial-killers, and may account for some of the more grisly homosexual practices: fisting, nipple-piercing, anal-singing, dung-eating, etc.
"the frequent co-existence of schizophrenic symptoms with perversions indicates a common fixation point in the undifferentiated phase and in defences against unneutralized aggression; the perverse symptoms represent an attempt at restitution of the narcissistic object relationship..."[83:240]
One homosexual on USENET, actually expressed a desire to have his foreskin slit longitudinally, have eyelets punched along both sides, which would then be laced up like a sneaker. Other kinds of such self-mutilation, including so-called "sex-change operations" also exist. This latter practice attests to a degeneration in the standards of modern medical practice --which prostitutes medical knowledge for sexual gratification, and which goes to great lengths to appease HIV activists (endangering others).
But the plurality of such perverse practices is a testimony to the complete lack of fulfilment in the homosexual "sex"-act itself. Most serial-killers are latent homosexuals.
Examples of Homosexual Molestation
There is the London, Ontario example to consider: 64 men have been charged with their connection to the production of child-pornography, featuring over 80 local boys. Four of the men who perpetrated these molestations were HIV-positive, and at least 29 of these boys are currently receiving counselling. And this followed upon a sting operation which resulted from parent's complaints about homosexuals attempting to molest children in public restrooms. But here are some others cases culled from the literature:
"[One] case involved a 27-year-old, HIV-positive convicted sodomite named Troy Rivara. Rivara had frequently loitered in the school-yard at Intermediate School 44 on West 77th Street, regaling male students with comments like, 'Can I have your butt?' The police had been called at least twice because neighbours were concerned about his many young male visitors. Then last July he was arrested for the abduction and rape of an 11-year-old boy who attended IS 44"[5]
"Why had the police apparently failed to follow up a neighbour's warnings that Rivara was bringing home young boys? Why did the parole officer not object to his moving into an apartment very near two schools, when a condition of his parole was that he stay away from children?" The reason is that the police and parole officer, grown men, were afraid of being considered "homophobic" by the public, or of the kind of bad publicity that homosexual groups, with media complicity, can create. Homosexuals regularly use such methods to force legal authorities to compromise the security of your children. The media must be held accountable for their crimes. "Why was there no questioning of the priorities of gay groups which, according to Miss Stanley, 'expressed concern that the suspect's right to confidentiality about his infection had been violated by the police'?" Here we see gay groups rushing to protect their molester friend, as they always do. Homosexuals are well aware that they disproportionately molest children, and always move quickly to protect their own.
Adoption and Molestation
The homosexual "right-to-adopt" takes on a new meaning when you consider that "... in August 1988, one Terry Pagel of Port Angeles, Washington, was picked up by police for sodomizing a 13-year-old foster child legally placed in his care --by that state's Department of Health and Human Services. The department had known all along the Pagel was homosexual, and it was also aware that a 16-year-old boy, also placed in his care, had some months prior been convicted of sodomising the same 13-year-old in Pagel's home. However a department spokesman, apparently a passionate defender of so-called gay rights, said the department had 'absolutely no intention of changing its policies' on placing troubled children with known homosexuals (New Dimensions, Jan 1990). The year prior, 42-year-old David Allen Lindsey of Florida, a 'father' who had 'adopted' 11 young boys, was discovered to have routinely sodomised them. He said on his way to jail, 'I get more out of boys than out of freedom'[56] Homosexual Robert Tucker, who died of AIDS at 57, had legally adopted 17 boys along the way (Philadelphia "Gay News", Mar 8, 1991)."[G358] Once again, we see authorities willing to take chances with the health and welfare of children, all in the name of "gay rights" --or from fear of bad-press. "The first sexual experience of the vast majority of homosexual men... was with a much OLDER homosexual. Even liberal Denmark has steadfastly refused homosexual adoption rights for this reason."[g8]
Normalisation of Molestation
Recently, fictive works have attempted to normalise homosexual molestation of children, in much the same way that Kinsey "normalised" homosexual behaviour by publishing evidence that it was true. Fictive works achieve their aim by generating a climate in which the perversity is portrayed as, not just normal, but desirable for all involved.
"Dennis Cooper's Try manifests [a great deal of sexual violence from the perspective of male homosexuality]. The protagonist, Ziggy, is a victim of child abuse at the hands of the gay couple who adopted him. Though child abuse is very much in the news these days and is always reprehended in the strongest terms, Cooper's take on the problem is one of ambivalence, when not verging on enthusiastic endorsement. Try is an extended fantasy of unbridled sexual license in which those whom society sees as the victims are willingly acquiescent if not entirely complicit in their own sexual exploitation. In this voided world, there is no family structure to speak of. Parents are absent, or else they are ersatz, like Ziggy's. Likewise, school is only a place for trusting and for the purchase of drugs. Crimes go shockingly unpunished. When, in a subplot, Uncle Ken sodomites the corpse of a 13-year-old who overdoses on the drugs Ken supplied, he simply disposes of the body and that's that. There would be little point in attempting to cite a passage, as it would not get past the judicious editors of this publication."[95]
As we should expect, the perverse liberal media quickly rushes to endorse this filth:
"The review for the New York Times states that 'Dennis Cooper has written a love story, all the more poignant because it is so brutally crushed.' The reviewer for Spin calls it 'Painfully poignant... beneath the queasy surface, no novelist empathises more with the pathos of put-upon youth.' Of course opinions may differ. But suffice it to say that I found no trace of poignancy at any level."
It's interesting to note that these deliberate attempts to create such a climate are always supported by law and society, whereas most legislation against people who express negative comments about homosexuals are based on the fact that these comments create a "dangerous climate" which supposedly will increase "gay bashing." (Let's face it, if "gay bashing" was such a problem, we wouldn't see so many homosexuals parading everywhere we look.)
The Mount Cashel Orphanage
The Mount Cashel scandal was not the first of its kind. Many short-memoried liberals who feel the Catholic church is "out of date", have tried to suggest that this occurrence resulted from Catholic strictures on sexual activity for priests outside of marriage (like in the Disney movie "Priest"), conveniently forgetting that this incident was only one of many incidents, a large proportion of which do not occur in religious settings.
We find organised molestation in places where men watch over boys --specifically when a parent or guardian is conveniently out of the picture. Homosexuals gravitate to all-male occupations because of their sexual "orientation", and take advantage of their position over children because of their characteristic lack of self-restraint.
One of the child-molesters at the Mount Cashel orphanage apparently knew full well what he was --as recounted by this survivor: "Word must have gotten back to Kenny, because he called an assembly in the middle of the night and started writing something on the blackboard. He wrote 'homo' and said, 'Do you think I'm a homo?' We didn't know what was going on. He kept punching the board and gritting his teeth. We were terrified and kept saying, 'No, Bro'."[O126] Apparently rumours about his 'sexual orientation' --expressed by the boys he molested-- reached his ears from outside.
"Kenny always had a boy around. There was always one kid who was favoured." and "He always had either money or candy in his pockets, and he would get little boys to reach in and dig around for it. Sometimes he'd have a lollipop in his mouth. I'd see him rub the candy over his lips and get the boys to lick it."[O127]
This reminds me of an incident at a local park. One of the coaches was clearly an effeminate homosexual, and attended even though he wasn't coaching during that particular game. He played soccer with a few of the kids, playing goalie, occasionally holding the ball behind his back --forcing the kids to rub against his front groin as they tried to reach around him, with each hand on either side, to get it. Effeminate homosexuals, being the most childish, are also the most dangerous.
Here we find a description of one of these molesters as recorded by our Mount Cashel survivor. We see that this particular molester was a prototypical effeminate homosexual: "[English] is very feminine. Everything about him is; his voice, his actions --even his little peach face. He seemed to float rather than walk, gliding across the floors. He was also a very timid person, and when he got nervous, he'd shake his arm and make his watch move up and down. At fifteen, I was taller than him, and stronger."[O136]
Paedophilia and Violence
Sex "researchers" trying to push pedophilia, often say that "Most paedophiles (people who are sexually interested in minor children).... are gentle and affectionate, and are not dangerous in the way child molesters are stereotypically considered to be." Robert O. Hawkins (SIECUS Report, Jan 1980).
Apparently (typically) that was not the case here "Ronny refused [English's sexual advances], and English beat him across the back with a broom handle. He was only eight or nine, and pretty puny. He had four or five big red welts on his back the next day."[O135] This person, an effeminate homosexual, and a "paedophile", could hardly described as "gentle and affectionate." What these sex "researchers" fail to mention is that paedophiles, who they describe as being like children, are capable of tantrums, bullying, and violence --also like children.
"In a thorough study of police records, probation pre-sentencing reports, courtroom transcripts, and medical reports, Christie, Marshall, and Lanthier in 1978 reported on 150 incarcerated sex-offenders. The found that 58 percent of the child-molesters were violent during the commission of the crime and 42 percent of the child victims were physically injured."[59]
"'Is it true,' I asked, 'what Ronnie said you did to him?', 'Oh, that's between me and Ronnie,' he replied"[O136] He claims that what happened was between him and the child. Like most homosexual proponents of man-boy "love", his brutality was clothed in the language of children's "rights." His reasoning, like that of homosexual advocates, could very well have been that the child was "innately homosexual" and that he was helping to the child to realise his potential as a "gay adult."
"[A child's sexual capacities] should be developed --in the same way as the child's inborn human capacity to talk or to walk." --Mary Calderone (SIECUS Report, May-July 1983 p.9) --yet ANOTHER "sex-research" pervert trying to get down children's pants.
Make no mistake about it, if gay organisations have their way, children will be similarly brutalised by homosexuals. Children are currently being sexually harassed in "sex-education" classes in many schools that place excessive emphasis on homosexuality and homosexual practices, to the detriment of normal sexual development. Children who don't toe the line are indoctrinated. It is only a short distance from encouraging homosexual activity to making them do it. In some countries (i.e. The Netherlands) such sexual experimentation classes do exist.
The dynamics of the result of homosexual molestation on the inmates at Mount Cashel were aptly expressed by this person.
'There's fellows sixteen and seventeen years old in here,' I said to English, 'going around asking other young fellows if they want a blow job because that's what you've been doing. When they come in here, you get a hold of them and turn them into perverts.'[O137]
Children, molested by homosexuals, act out that molestation on others in a cycle of victimisation. Some, like the author of the Mount-Cashel account, manage to achieve heterosexual adaptation --but many don't: Their lives are forever destroyed by homosexual victimisation.
The Typical Pederastic Society
The institutionalised homosexual victimisation of children, the ultimate goal of many "sex-researchers" and others, is an attempt to remake society in the image of some primitive communities. This image can be found in typically r-strategy societies, where more emphasis is placed on having many children than on raising them properly. It is only natural that in these societies, the selfish sexual interests of homosexual male adults would triumph over concerns about proper upbringing. In such societies, the strong prey on the weak in a self-perpetuating cycle of sexual molestation --the law of the jungle.
These societies are typically black, but we should note that most black societies have not regressed in such a florid fashion. In fact, pederastic communities, and those which "recognise" homosexual behaviour, are relatively abnormal in human history --especially in civilised societies (as we shall see later).
Among the various homosexual/molestation communities, we find, "the Siwans, a small North African tribe, the Kerski of New Guinea, the Kiwai, the Aranda of Australia, 'a small Melanasian island community', the Manus of New Guinea, the Mohave Indians, the Zuni Indians of North America, the Big Nambas, Siberian Chukchee."[W17] It is obvious, considering the literally thousands of tribes in existence, that sex-"researchers" must have had to really scrape the bottom of the barrel for these examples.
And even with these examples before us, it should be noted that most researchers agree that "no primitive society, not even the most permissive, has accepted the open practice of exclusive homosexuality as a permanent way of life by large numbers of adults."[W21] Apparently it is not a "viable" way of life for all --or even most societies. Also, "the use of culture as a definitional basis for species abnormality is on very shaky anthropological footing: cross-cultural data readily yield endless examples of culturally sanctioned behaviour which could only be considered pathological...."[73]
The pattern of the pederastic society can be found by examining this case, which is reported to be typical of many of the tribes listed above:
"Among the Kerski of New Guinea, the young men were introduced to anal intercourse at puberty by older men, and thereafter spent the rest of their bachelorhood doing the same to other initiates."[W17]
That is, pubescent youths were molested by older youths. As they got older, they did the same to other pubescent youths --perpetuating the cycle of molestation. We may assume, from our research, that a fair proportion of these youths remain in this state --that they are stuck in a diseased, cowardly, sterile, infantile, and retarded mode of sexual development. This is the pattern of pederasty which Kinsey encouraged, which homosexual activists champion, and which already has a firm foothold in our society. We find it at Mount Cashel, in British boarding-schools, and in other places where homosexuals rule unrestrained over boys.
"Abram Kardiner, former Professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University, recipient of the Humanities Prize of the New York Times in 1966, and expert in the area of psychoanalytic investigation of cultures, warns: 'There is an EPIDEMIC form of homosexuality, which is more than the usual incidence, which generally occurs in social crises or in declining cultures where license and boundless permissiveness dulls the pain of ceaseless anxiety, universal hostility and divisiveness.'[70]"[s89]
Conclusion
We should take a good look at this before we legalise homosexual practices among the young, before we give homosexuals a legal "right" to seduce our children, or to adopt. Unfortunately, because of our illegitimate and elitist government and legal system, which bows more to the pressure of these groups than to the will of the electorate, many of these "rights" have been already been given to homosexuals. It is now only a question of their "exercising" these rights. Unfortunately, in most instances, only illegal action remains as the only course of action left, but this is the just desserts of a legal system that compromises its integrity to political pressure.
We have two KINDS of society. One which is typical of civilised man, places emphasis on proper rearing of children, and subordinates sexual desire to reason; the other is typical of a few primitive tribes, prostitutes it's children for sexual gratification, and represents a tyranny of sexual desire over all other considerations --science and law bending to its dictates.
One the one side you have normal human beings leading productive lives, with (we must admit) the physical intimidation of perverts; on the other side you have homosexuals, paedophiles, lovers of beasts, and other cowardly scum roaming the streets, and the molestation of children --so much so that you will have to hire bodyguards (like in Greece) to keep them safe. Either the bars are on your windows, or they're on theirs: There is no third option.
The sexual revolution was an attempt to initialise a chain-reaction in human behaviour that would push us over the precipice into this other, degenerate mode of functioning --in accordance with the sexual desires of the degenerate Kinsey. Which side are you on? What kind of society do YOU want?
Homosexuals Disproportionately Molest Children