The Kinsey Report: Revealed as Fraud
Their power derives from unity, vociferousness, and media support --not from numerical strength: The percentage of the population which is homosexual is between 1 and 4 percent.[1]
"The best modern studies from Norway (1987), Denmark (1989), Britain (1989), and the U.S. (1993), based on thousands of subjects, tell us that the percentage of committed homosexuals in society at large is not the fabled 'ten per cent', but rather from one, to one and a half percent."[g8]
"Kinsey's 10 per cent figure for the proportion of the population that is homosexual is by now discredited. The new study by the Batelle Human Affairs Research Centre places exclusive homosexual males at 1.1 per cent..."[2]
Current research indicates that in the United States, as in other developed societies, somewhat over 1 per cent of the population is exclusively homosexual.... the Kinsey 'finding' rested upon extremely dubious methodology, including data gathered from an unrepresentatively large number of men in prison."[6]
Kinsey's Fraudulent Report
Apparently Kinsey's adult male sample consisted largely of people who had volunteered to be interviewed, which resulted in volunteer bias: the "process of enlisting volunteers results in an over-selection of persons who tend to exhibit (and take delight in admitting) unconventional behaviour".[R20]
Maslow tested and warned Kinsey of this effect and provided a demonstration, but Kinsey withheld the evidence. Even AFTER the demonstration, he wrote "how [volunteering] affects a sexual history is not yet clear"(Male Report, p. 103). In other words, Kinsey lied.
"[McNemar's calculations] confirm the suspicion that willingness to volunteer is associated with greater than average sexual activity. And since the volunteers account for about three-fourths of the 5,300 males reported upon in this volume, it follows that Kinsey's figures, in all probability, give an exaggerated notion of the amount of sexual activity in the general population" (Terman, L.M., "Kinsey's Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male': Some Comments and Criticisms." Psychological Bulletin 45:443-459, 1948).
As noted by Terman, "many" of the volunteers were actually seeking advice in connection with their personal problem --e.g., looking for information on such topics as "[what are the] harmful effects of 'excessive' sexual activity?" (Male Report, p. 37). Kinsey's report also included..."[a] number of histories from 'persons who are professionally involved in sexual activities (as prostitutes, pimps, exhibitionists, etc.)...'(Male Report, pp. 40,41)." [R21]
New information has subsequently come to light which makes even these errors in methodology seem slight. It turns out that "up to a quarter of the study sample were prisoners (44% of whom had had homosexual experience in prison, and perhaps even more had experience out of prison... ) and most, if not all, of the high school students, were from a group that was 'aberrant' because of an unusually high percentage of boys with homosexual experience!"[R23]
"This group was so overtly unrepresentative of society, then or now, that the fact that a group of 'scientists' defined the 'normal' sexual behaviours of U.S. males from this sample is astonishing in retrospect."[R21]
Kinsey's Promotion of Paedophilia
By promoting the idea that "everyone is doing it" --an idea familiar to high-school students as "peer-pressure"-- such pleasurable "exploration" was legitimised in the eyes of the public. Kinsey's desire was to encourage such activity, not just among adults --but between adults and children as well...
To do this, Kinsey supervised the sexual molestation of over 200 boys for his report on Male Child Sexuality --which should give you some idea about the kind of company he kept. This fact can be readily deduced from what he has written in his report, along with other documents from him and his "Research Institute." The ethics of the attainment of this data and its methodology (which included molesting necessarily restrained children of less than 1 year old for up to 24 hours), was never questioned by the so-called "scientists" who reviewed his work:
"...and these data, together with the records supplied by some older subjects who have had sexual contacts with younger boys, provide material for describing the different sorts of reactions which may occur... [T]he data supplied by adult observers of 196 pre-adolescent boys are the sources of the percentage figures indicating the frequency of each type of orgasm among such young males"(Male Report, p. 160)
"Elsewhere, Kinsey recorded that 200 boys between 1 and 14 years were OBSERVED in orgasm (Male Report, p. 175) and that 'actual observations' of 'climax' were made on 206 males between 5 months and 14 years (Male Report, p. 176)."[R30]
"Better data on pre-adolescent climax come from the histories of adult males who have had sexual contacts with younger boys and who, with their adult backgrounds, are able to recognise and interpret the boys' experiences. Unfortunately, not all of the subjects with such contacts in their histories were questioned on this point of pre-adolescent reactions; but 9 of our adult male subjects have observed such orgasm. Some of these adults are technically trained persons who have kept diaries or other records, which have been put at our disposal; and from them we have secured information on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self-masturbation, or who were observed in contacts with other boys or older adults"(Male Report, pp. 166, 177)
"It is documented then that nine paedophiles (some 'technically trained') were at the core of Kinsey's child sex experiments."[R30]
How did they determine whether or not the children were having an "orgasm"? "Here Kinsey documents six types of preadolescent orgasm from these 'histories'
'Extreme tension with violent convulsion ... gasping, eyes staring ... mouth distorted, sometimes with tongue protruding ... whole body or parts of it spasmodically twitching ... throbs or violent jerking of the penis ... groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries ... masochistic [?] reactions ... more or less frenzied movements ... extreme trembling, collapse, loss of colour, and sometimes fainting of subject ... pained or frightened ... will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive definite pleasure from the situation. [Male Report, p. 161; emphasis added].'"[R39] (Notice he used the word "partner" to describe the molester.
Another description of pre-pubescent "orgasm" includes mention of "...a sudden release with convulsions, including anal contractions --followed by the disappearance of all symptoms"(Male Report, p.177) One might wonder how these "anal contractions" were "sensed" by the sex-offender who, we might note, was also masturbating the child.
One paediatrician noted [R40]: "One person could not do this to so many children --These children had to be held down or subject to strapping down, otherwise they would not respond willingly" --Lester H. Caplan, M.D., F.A.C.P.
"The idea [of childhood sexuality] may have been Freud's, but it was the work of the Kinsey team that attempted to demonstrate the reality, providing the first scientific data to support the claim that children can both desire and benefit from genital sex with adults."[R19]
One might wonder why Kinsey would do all this. As it turns out "Kinsey's background indicates that he placed himself in professional and non-professional positions where he had access to young boys, such as Y.M.C.A. camp counsellor, boys' club leader, and Boy Scout leader --activities that he kept up 'during his college and graduate years, and even after his marriage.' [60] As a sex researcher, Kinsey structured his research in a manner that made sexual experimentation with children a legitimate part of his scientific endeavour. And he used the research results to promote the acceptance of paedophilia."[R205]
Other Perverts
Kinsey successfully legitimised a whole host of abnormal behaviour by publicising "evidence" that suggested it was commonplace, as if the very fact that something, say arson, occurred throughout history would in some way justify our doing it now. But Kinsey was not alone. Many researchers and others, eager to generate public sanction for their particular perversion, jumped on the band-wagon, and using the same techniques: "[I]nternationally known sex-educators such as Wardell Pomeroy (his books 'Boys and Sex,' and 'Girls and Sex' have sold about 10,000 copies in Canada) has argued in Canadian and American courts, that 'incest between children and adults can sometimes be beneficial.' So can sex with animals, he says --as long as you don't hurt the animal!"[g7]
"[S]pecialist magazine shops in big cities... purvey vast quantities of homosexual erotica.... one comes upon shelf upon shelf of lurid picture books.... sadistic interests are amply catered for by drawings of naked youths tied up. Rows of shelves are stacked with homosexual novels and pseudo-scientific texts with titillating case-histories."[W113](1967)(emphasis mine)
"CASE 74- The brothers were 12 and 13 when a man came over to them, opened his pants and started masturbating in front of them. The boys became excited when the man let them masturbate him. He told the 12 year old to start sucking him. As the boy put the penis in his mouth, the man released his sperm, which the boy swallowed." --R.E.L. Masters, "Sexual Self-Stimulation"
Conclusion
The purpose of all of these (false) "cases", portraying paedophilia, homosexuality, and incest, as well as the Kinsey "research" and Pomeroy's paedophilic garbage, was to create an atmosphere in which such cowardly perversions are portrayed as normal and pleasurable behaviour for all involved. All of these activities, molesting children, bestiality, homosexuality, ultimately derive from cowardice --from an incapacitating fear of women. The fact that the "everyone is doing it" justification is common among adolescents is not coincidental: The purveyors of this trash intended to incite the molestation of children by teens, or by adults with an adolescent emotional development (homosexuals). The main characteristic of the "sixties-generation" and their "sexual revolution" was childishness --a refusal to grow up and lead responsible lives; and selfishness --a willingness to sacrifice their children's happiness and future to their present sexual gratification.
It is significant, as we will see later, that a study which reported such a disproportionate amount of homosexuality should also be associated with the molestation of little boys --and that all of this nonsense found fertile ground in the childish, selfish nature of the sixties-generation. The political intent of these fraudulent experiments, was to legitimise adult-child homosexual relations by appealing to the selfish sexual-interests of a foolish generation --to encourage a pederast revolution in North-American society.
The Kinsey Report : Revealed as fraud